Abstract
This Essay addresses reasons for impacted stakeholder involvement in AI governance, ranging from democratic accountability norms to principles of regulatory design. It evaluates several recent examples of both soft and hard law, noting a range of examples of impacted stakeholder participation. It closes with a critique: none of these laws adequately contemplates how to craft transparency and provide expertise so as to meaningfully empower impacted stakeholders.
[pdf-embedder url="https://www.uclalawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/securepdfs/2024/05/04-Kaminski-No-Bleed.pdf" title="04 - Kaminski No-Bleed"]