Authoruclalaw

Credit CARD Act II: Expanding Credit Card Reform by Targeting Behavioral Biases

Three years ago, the U.S. Congress passed the Credit CARD Act of 2009. This ambitious piece of consumer protection legislation sought to relieve consumer debt burdens by targeting credit card industry abuses and providing new disclosures. Congress acknowledged that the legislation would not help individuals who borrow irresponsibly on their credit cards, implicitly assuming that it could not...

The Supreme Court’s Regulation of Civil Procedure: Lessons From Administrative Law

In this Article, we argue that the U.S. Supreme Court should route most Federal Rules of Civil Procedure issues through the notice-and-comment rulemaking process of the Civil Rules Advisory Committee instead of issuing judgments in adjudications, unless the Court can resolve the case solely through the deployment of traditional tools of statutory interpretation. While we are not the first to...

Techniques for Mitigating Cognitive Biases in
Fingerprint Identification

Since the U.S. Supreme Court’s holdings in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael, which articulated that judges have a gatekeeping responsibility to ensure that all expert testimony is sufficiently reliable, academic critics have reviewed forensic science evidence with greater scrutiny. While fingerprint identification has historically been touted as...

Implicit Bias in the Courtroom

Given the substantial and growing scientific literature on implicit bias, the time has now come to confront a critical question: What, if anything, should we do about implicit bias in the courtroom? The author team comprises legal academics, scientists, researchers, and even a sitting federal judge who seek to answer this question in accordance with behavioral realism. The Article first provides...

To Show Virtue Her Own Feature

Each year, the UCLA School of Law presents the Rutter Award for Excellence in Teaching to an outstanding law professor. On April 3, 2012, this honor was given to Professor Pavel Wonsowicz. UCLA Law Review Discourse is proud to continue its tradition of publishing a modified version of the ceremony speech delivered by the award recipient.

Forthcoming Symposium: Twenty-First Century Litigation: Pathologies and Possibilities A Symposium in Honor of Stephen Yeazell

It is with great pleasure that we announce the 2012-2013 Symposium topic: Twenty-First Century Litigation: Pathologies and Possibilities A Symposium in Honor of Stephen Yeazell We thank Professors Joanna Schwartz and Jennifer Mnookin for submitting the selected proposal that examines the state of modern civil litigation and, in so doing, celebrates the work of Professor Yeazell. He is the leading...

Reconciling Caperton and Citizens United: When Campaign Spending Should Compel Recusal of Elected Officials

Two recent high-profile U.S. Supreme Court decisions—Caperton and Citizens United—promise to fundamentally alter the landscape of campaign finance at all levels of government. At first glance, however, their holdings appear to be in considerable tension with one another. This Comment argues that we should overcome this tension by reading the decisions with reference to the form of power exercised...

More Than Just a Formality: Instant Authorship and Copyright’s Opt-Out Future in the Digital Age

The digital age has forever changed the role of copyright in promoting the progress of science and the arts. The era of instant authorship has provided copyright to countless authors who are not motivated by copyright incentives. It has also made it impracticable for copyright to return to a system requiring author adherence to formalities, such as notice and registration. Though many...

/* ]]> */