2010 Symposium – February 19–20
Sexuality and Gender Law: Assessing the Field, Envisioning the Future
co-sponsored by the Williams Institute
Both in scholarship and in judicial opinions, issues related to sexuality and gender constitute one of the most dynamic and vibrant fields in American law. Yet there has been no sustained examination or critique of the field itself and of its importance to constitutional theory more generally. This conference will bring together leading scholars from both inside and outside the field to reflect on how sexuality and gender has changed the law, and how the field itself is likely to change.
Please click to REGISTER for the event. MCLE credit is available for attendees – 5.75 hours for Friday, and 3.75 for Saturday. Additional questions regarding the symposium can be sent to the Law Review Symposium Editors.
Video from the Symposium
Participants Include:
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Kathryn
Abrams |
|
Lee
Badgett |
|
Aaron
Belkin |
|
Kim
Buchanan |
|
Devon
Carbado |
|
Matt
Coles |
|
Mary Anne
Case |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Kimberlé Crenshaw
|
|
Scott
Cummings |
|
Bill
Eskridge |
|
Chai
Feldblum |
|
Katherine
Franke |
|
Suzanne
Goldberg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
|
 |
|

|
|

|
|

|
|
|
|
Nan
Hunter |
|
Pamala
Karlan |
|
Sonya
Katyal |
|
Justice
Katz |
|
Zachary Kramer
|
|
Holning
Lau |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
|

|
|
 |
|
 |
|

|
|
Melissa
Murray |
|
Doug
NeJaime |
|
Nancy
Polikoff |
|
Russell
Robinson |
|
Laura
Rosenbury |
|
Teemu
Ruskola |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
|

|
|

|
|

|
|

|
|
 |
|
|
|
Brad
Sears |
|
Reva
Siegel |
|
Dean
Spade |
|
Ed
Stein |
|
Leti
Volpp |
|
Kenji
Yoshino |
|
Justice
Beier |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks too to Skadden Arps, Irell & Manella, Kirkland & Ellis, and McGuireWoods for their generous support.
From the large quantity of scholarship already produced in this field, the speakers at this conference distilled important insights and broad contributions to the intellectual growth of law. In addition, each of the panels explore ldikely future developments in their respective subject matter areas.
Friday February 19
9:00 – 10:15 a.m.
The Difference a Field Makes:
The Impact of Sexuality and Gender Law Scholarship on the Law and Legal Scholarship
What has been the impact – intellectual and otherwise – of the field of sexuality and gender law on the shape and scope of public law? How, if at all, has it affected basic paradigms such as the border between public and private or doctrinal fields such as the First Amendment? Is it still a ghettoized field?
Bill Eskridge
Pam Karlan
Reva Siegel
10:30 a.m. – 11:45 p.m.
Theories Behind Multidimensional Advocacy
Reform movements have the potential to shift culture as well as change rules. When can law create tipping points for deep-seated change? How and why do courts move from seeing LGBT equality claims as outliers to perceiving that the state lacks a rational basis to discriminate?
Scott Cummings
Doug NeJaime
Suzanne Goldberg
Melissa Murray
Nancy Polikoff
12:00 -1:00 p.m. Lunch
1:00-2:30 p.m.
The Impact Sexuality and Gender Law and Policy Scholarship on LGBT Rights
Much of sexuality and gender legal scholarship has been motivated by and directed towards advancing the rights of LGBT people. What contributions has LGBT legal scholarship made? Where has it has fallen short and what more could it do? What about the impact of the growing body of empirical scholarship directed at LGBT-related laws and public polices?
Lee Badgett
Aaron Belkin
Matt Coles
Matt Nosanchuk
3:00-4:30 p.m.
Intersectionality
In the last 20 years, numerous legal scholars have looked to the concept of intersectionality, introduced by Kimberlé Crenshaw, to understand how sexuality, race, gender and other forms of oppression intertwine. Panelists will address how transgender identity informs intersectionality and vice versa; examine how race, gender, and sexuality structure relationships at work beyond the context of sexual harassment; and analyze how comparisons of “gays” to “blacks” in the contexts of equal protection advocacy and Proposition 8 discourse have been inattentive to the actual legal status of African-Americans of all sexual orientations.
Devon Carbado
Russell Robinson
Laura Rosenbury
Zak Kramer
5:00 – 6:30 p.m.
Final Round, 6th Annual Williams Institute Moot Court Competition on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law
6:30 – 8:30 p.m.
Gala and Reception
Saturday February 20
9:00-10:20 a.m.
Sexuality in a Global Culture
Extraordinary developments are happening, even in unlikely places, in the understandings of the relationship between sexuality and governance. Are western legal norms being exported in culturally problematic ways? Are common threads possible? Will non-western legal norms affect American and European law?
Kim Buchanan
Sonia Katyal
Teemu Ruskola
Holning Lau
Leti Volpp
10:40 a.m.-12:00 p.m.
The Many Meanings of Gender
The long association between homosexuality and gender norm deviance is merely one of many examples of the intersections between sexuality and gender. “Gay rights law” began in an era of the expansion of women’s rights, and has now spawned a rapidly growing new field of transgender law. Is gender still a useful frame for understanding state regulation of sexuality? Was it ever? What is the future of gender scholarship, especially as to the workplace?
Kathy Abrams
Mary Anne Case
Katherine Franke
Dean Spade
Ed Stein
12:30-1:30 p.m. Lunch
Next Steps: The Future of Sexuality and Gender Law and Scholarship
Nan Hunter
Kenji Yoshino
—