ARTICLELawyering for Marriage Equality
Scott L. Cummings*
57 UCLA L. Rev. 1235
Critics of litigation seeking to establish the right of same-sex couples to marry argue that it has produced a backlash undercutting the movement for marriage equality. In this account, movement lawyers emerge as agents of backlash: naively turning to the courts ahead of public opinion, ignoring more productive political alternatives, and ultimately hurting the very cause they purport to advance by securing a court victory that mobilizes opponents to repeal it. This Article challenges the backlash thesis through a close analysis of the California case, which contradicts the portrait of movement lawyers as unsophisticated rights crusaders and casts doubt on the causal claim that court decisions upholding same-sex couples’ right to marry have harmed the movement.
* Professor of Law, UCLA School of Law.
** Associate Professor of Law, Loyola Law School, Los Angeles.
Leave a Reply
UCLA Law Review - All Rights Reserved